Head-to-head comparisons with the figures that decide them — uplink, transfer allowance, storage and the point at which one option overtakes the other.
7 entries
# The Cheapest Seedbox Is Not the One With the Lowest Price The cheapest seedbox on the market right now costs €2.99 a month. It is also, by a wide margin, the most expensive way to store a terabyte....
A small business buying hosting is not making the same purchase as a hobbyist. The site is load-bearing: it takes enquiries, bookings or orders, and an afternoon of slow pages costs real money. That c...
This is not really a comparison of two hosts. It is a comparison of two positions on a single question: **who administers the server?** Vultr sells you a machine. ScalaHosting sells you a machine plu...
Almost every hosting comparison written for beginners optimises for the wrong thing. It ranks hosts by feature count, when the features that decide a first website are three, and none of them appear i...
Seedboxes and cloud storage both end up holding large amounts of data on somebody else's hardware, so they get compared constantly. They are built for opposite access patterns, and picking the wrong o...
Shared hosting and managed VPS are usually compared on raw speed. That is the least useful axis. A well-tuned shared plan on LiteSpeed will serve a cached page about as fast as a VPS will — sometimes ...
A seedbox and a VPS can look identical on a spec sheet: both are remote Linux machines, both give you disk and bandwidth, both cost between $5 and $30 a month. The difference is not what they are — it...